[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: AC_PATH_XTRA vs modular xorg



On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:19 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 19:06 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:22 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > Does AC_PATH_XTRA (an autoconf macro used in configure.ac to figure out
> > > X library and include paths) cause problems with modular xorg? 
> > Nope, it doesn't, at least it should not.
> >
> Thanks -- I'll take a harder look at what exactly is broken in this
> configure script.
> 
The problem turns out to be autoconf's AC_PATH_X macro's checking for
the existence of X11/Intrinsic.h which is owned by libXt-devel.  This
isn't a needed dependency for building the package and has been patched
upstream but is not yet in our autoconf.

Orion opened a bug on this earlier:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176379

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]