[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: mock + ccache? (was Re: nothing from buildsys?)



2006/2/7, Brian Long <brilong cisco com>:
> On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 12:14 -0700, Lamont R. Peterson wrote:
> > On Friday 03 February 2006 11:44am, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 10:45 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote:
> > > > That reminds me...  Has anyone ever tried to tie mock and ccache
> > > > together somehow?  It seems like that would speed up repeated build
> > > > attempts noticably.
> > >
> > > It is potentially possible, but the problem is that ccache has in the
> > > past caused build issues from time to time for various people outside of
> > > mock. I dare not think what chaos it could wreak in a semi-automated
> > > buildsystem. distcc *might* be a better choice, once it's ready.
> >
> > Instead of distcc, how about considering icecream?
>
> Interesting.  http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=icecream
>
> We use Teambuilder (mentioned in the IceCream wiki) for distributed
> builds.  It's a commercial product from Trolltech.
>
> /Brian/
> --
>        Brian Long                      |         |           |
>        IT Data Center Systems          |       .|||.       .|||.
>        Cisco Linux Developer           |   ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:..
>        Phone: (919) 392-7363           |   C i s c o   S y s t e m s
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

Hello

well my opinion is that there should be config hooks to easily hook in
components like ccache distcc and/or icecream.

regards,
Rudolf Kastl


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]