[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: OLPC 'upstream'



On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:58:06 +0000, Andy Green <andy warmcat com> wrote:
> Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:47:52 +0000, Andy Green <andy warmcat com> wrote:
> > 
> >>Actually quite encouraging, we'll see if "busybox" and "newlib" or
> >>"uclibc" form part of Rehdat's concept. 
> > 
> > You must be raving mad to suggest uclibc. Was that supposed to be a
> > sarcastic pun on the miniscule RAM spec?
> 
> What do you see shrivelling up and dying from contact with uclibc?

I see now that you built Asterisk with it, so it cannot be all that bad.
My experience may be stale.

> What is your opinion about newlib?

It's supposed to be better, but I do not have a personal exposure.

-- Pete


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]