FC6 and cdburning
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Jul 29 13:40:42 UTC 2006
On Saturday 29 July 2006 09:36, dragoran wrote:
> breaking burning for many users isn't really a solution, we should try
> to fix the problem which should be solved by the update by backporting
> the fix or anything like this...
Again, I'm pretty sure we can't roll back cdrecord for it breaks other things.
> > The problem with allowing commands is that they are different per device.
> > What might be BURNFREE for one device could very well be FLASH FIRMWARE
> > on another device.
> >
> >
>
> where have you got this info from? sounds odd .. aren't such commands
> defined in some spec so that all devices uses them (correct me if I am
> wrong)
This was from Dave J. I REALLY doubt there is a singular spec that all
burners use. Its different by manufacturer which is why we can't just
say 'these commands are safe for all devices', it has to be on a per-device
level and the kernel currently can't handle that. Needs to be fixed in the
upstream kernel.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060729/d00d2c5b/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list