Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-14

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Thu Jun 15 15:00:56 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 15:54 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> In most cases I would disagree with this. pkgconfig should be a dep
> of 
> any package that provides a .pc file, which would result in pkgconfig 
> being pulled in by the normal buildreqs of most packages (-devel 
> packages for required libraries). 

I don't agree with this. -devel packages are useful w/out using
pkgconfig.  If the package you are BUILDING can't figure things out
w/out pkgconfig, then that package must BuildRequires it.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060615/8805d2f0/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list