Testing Fedora - small (?) suggestion.

[Jesse Keating]

On Sunday 12 November 2006 07:18, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This is the typical  discuss-things-endlessly-before-even-trying  type of
> conversation. Meanwhile, the "Package EVR problems in FC+FE" report [1]
> gets longer (even ".FC6" dist tags pop up in there - what the heck?!), and
> Extras packagers don't rebuild their devel packages either. Even if they
> managed to do so with a time-consuming mock build, they could not update
> their rawhide machines (or upgrade FC6 to rawhide) without trying to hack a
> long list of excludes.

And extras people can't rebuild against packages that don't get published.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061112/a176f733/attachment.sig>