Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?

Jeff Spaleta jspaleta at gmail.com
Mon Nov 13 17:39:08 UTC 2006


On 11/13/06, Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com> wrote:
>  It's means almost all things in /etc/readahead.d/default.* could be
>  obsolete after an update (except stable things like /bin/*).

I agree... which is why i think its important to have this discussion
in the list.. instead of just in the bugzilla report.  The rpm query
is a neat trick.  If you want to pump up a few throwaway readahead
packages to test new ideas to solve this issue, I'll be happy to offer
my system up for inadvertent destruction testing them.


-jef




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list