Core + Exrtas 2

Jeffrey C. Ollie jeff at ocjtech.us
Mon Nov 20 17:13:52 UTC 2006


On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 18:09 +0100, Leszek Matok wrote:
> Dnia 20-11-2006, pon o godzinie 09:12 -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie
> napisał(a):
> > Here's a proposal to consider:
> > 
> > "Official" packages for Fedora release X would consist of those packages
> > that exist in the development repository at the time that release X is
> > branched, (...)
> 
> > However, builds for new packages could be requested for non-development
> > branches.  The binary packages would go into the same yum repos as
> > official packages but would have "unofficial" status.
> What you propose would become the new Extras - there would be "official"
> and "unofficial" where currently there's "Core" and "Extras".

Kindof... it would mostly control what kind of updates could be applied
to a package in a release branch and which packages could be selected in
a CD/DVD compose and still be branded as "Fedora".

Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061120/41af4a64/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list