sysvinit VS initng VS upstart VS launchd (Was: Future New Init for FC7?)

[dragoran dragoran]

On 4/4/07, Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:37:10PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >
> > LSB had just finished standardizing the init scripts and now we're
> > going to break things again.  Users *are* going to complain.
> > Analysts *are* going to say Linux is fragmented.  Microsoft *is*
> > going to publish studies saying that Linux has higher TCO because
> > of multiple init systems ;-)
> >
> > This doesn't mean there should be a single codebase.  Multiple
> > systems could compete as long as they are 100% (or maybe just 99%)
> > compatible config files and user interface.
>
> All the init systems should be parallel installable, so the choice is
> only for the default init system.


if we go this route system-config-services should support multiple
backends....

--
> Pat
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070404/34bd4e8d/attachment.htm>