hal + pam update errors
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Thu Apr 5 18:00:22 UTC 2007
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:54:36PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > you can't do an arch-specific obsolete. At best it'll grab all of them.
> > and that's at _best_.
> So should I undo the split of hal into hal and hal-libs? Please advise.
The split seems okay; I think hal should just be whitelisted as i386.
Or really, why isn't it automatically picked up because it's required by
firefox.i386 et al?
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list