[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: JBoss and Fedora



Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 13:45 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot writes:
>  > Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 11:07 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit :
>  > > Nicolas Mailhot writes:
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > the consensus seems to be it's more efficient to wait for the
>  > >  > actual Java 7 SUN GPL release than make gcj feature-complete enough
>  > >  > for JBoss.
>  > > 
>  > > Really?  The consensus among whom?  I wonder what that's based on.
>  > 
>  > The consensus as expressed by the Fedora Java team on this list in the
>  > past
> 
> I doubt it.  I could only find one posting with the  Google query 
> site://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/ jboss gcj
> and that was from one "Nicolas Mailhot".

Then it was on one of the other Linux & Java technical lists
(fedora-maintainers, fedora-extras, fedora-devel-java,
jpackage-discuss zarb org). Java team members participate in many
different public forums, and I won't pretend I track each of their
messages.

If you deem gcj ready for JBoss feel free to submit a set of JBoss
packages. I certainly won't stop you. You can take the jpackage rpms as
starting point (though now JBoss is Red Hat the submission should
probably come from the JBoss division itself)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]