[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: JBoss and Fedora



Nicolas Mailhot writes:
 > Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 13:45 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit :
 > > Nicolas Mailhot writes:
 > >  > Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 11:07 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit :
 > >  > > Nicolas Mailhot writes:
 > >  > >  > 
 > >  > >  > the consensus seems to be it's more efficient to wait for the
 > >  > >  > actual Java 7 SUN GPL release than make gcj feature-complete enough
 > >  > >  > for JBoss.
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > Really?  The consensus among whom?  I wonder what that's based on.
 > >  > 
 > >  > The consensus as expressed by the Fedora Java team on this list in the
 > >  > past
 > > 
 > > I doubt it.  I could only find one posting with the  Google query 
 > > site://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/ jboss gcj
 > > and that was from one "Nicolas Mailhot".
 > 
 > Then it was on one of the other Linux & Java technical lists
 > (fedora-maintainers, fedora-extras, fedora-devel-java,
 > jpackage-discuss zarb org). Java team members participate in many
 > different public forums, and I won't pretend I track each of their
 > messages.

It seems this consensus is rather fleeting.

 > If you deem gcj ready for JBoss feel free to submit a set of JBoss
 > packages.

I'll be sure to let you know.

Andrew.

-- 
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]