rpms/uqm/devel uqm.spec,1.12,1.13

[Michael Schwendt]

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:41:24 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> Jesse Keating schrieb:
> > On Friday 20 April 2007 11:02:28 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> >> On 4/20/07, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam at arcor.de> wrote:
> >>>> --- uqm.spec  27 Jan 2007 02:33:09 -0000      1.12
> >>>> +++ uqm.spec  20 Apr 2007 01:32:41 -0000      1.13
> >>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >>>>  Name:           uqm
> >>>>  Version:        0.6.2
> >>>> -Release:        1%{?dist}
> >>>> +Release:        1.1%{?dist}
> >>> Should have been
> >>>
> >>> Release:        1.%{?dist}.1
> >> Oh? News to me. Is that a new guideline?
> > 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-378ec5e6a73d5425d55c115ff5d0fa5f5094dcba
> 
> That section is titled "Minor release bumps for old branches" -- but
> this was devel afaics.
> 
> BTW, I curios, too, why it should have been "1.%{?dist}.1" (and yes, I
> fully understand that 1.%{?dist}.1 makes sense in old branches).

OMG, I made typo. Should have read:  1%{?dist}.1

And yes, 2%{?dist} would have been fine, too.