[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Updates-testing on firstboot



Luke Macken wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 04:03:42AM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 05:29:44PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
   The current situation with updates-testing is that bug fixes tend to get
   pushed straight into updates. Updates-testing gets little coverage so few
   devs or testers use it. Its a vicious circle. A cursory glance show some
   packages are over 5 months old.
I'm hoping that Bodhi[0] will eventually help improve updates-testing by allowing
testers to get more involved with the whole process.  Once testers can
provide positive/negative feedback to the devs regarding updates, I think
that it will become much more utilized.

Also, the fact that we're going to be forcing all non-security updates
to go into updates-testing first will help as well.

Bodhi looks really interesting. What's its proper discussion forum?

In case fedora-devel is the proper forum, a question: what happens to updates that are in updates-testing and then fail community QA? Do their rpms get yanked from updates-testing? It seems that today, it's difficult to yank rpms, and the updates-testing repo has junk in it.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/47277/focus=47278


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]