Qemu Fedora 8 (possible enhancement?)

[Mark Bidewell]

I double checked, I still get "not compiled".  I am not using -smp, but I am
running x86_64 (If that means anything)

Mark Bidewell.

On 8/10/07, Matthias Saou <
thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net> wrote:
>
> Kelly wrote :
>
> > On Thursday 09 August 2007 09:57:04 pm Mark Bidewell wrote:
> > > A few days ago the question of kqemu inclusion in the kernel was
> discussed
> > > on list.  A related question is support for kqemu in qemu.  The
> default
> > > install of qemu in fedora has this support explicitly disabled so even
> if
> > > you wanted to use kqemu (either kmod, dkms, or compiled) you would
> have to
> > > build qemu from source.  Would there be any objection to allowing
> support
> > > for kqemu in the fedora RPM?
> > >
> > > Mark Bidewell
> >
> > Odd, my Qemu works with KQemu...
>
> Yup, same here, the default package uses kqemu just fine.
>
> One catch, though, which I took almost an entire day of searching to
> find out : If you use the -smp option, kqemu support will _always_ be
> disabled. This is not mentioned in the docs anywhere.
>
> Matthias
>
> --
> Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
> Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) - Linux kernel 2.6.22.1-41.fc7
> Load : 0.62 0.86 0.68
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070810/9f388ba8/attachment.htm>