[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Rebuilds needed for Fedora 8



Jesse Keating wrote:
> A less technical but a nonetheless important rebuild issue is
> correct package licensing.  We have a goal to have all our packages
> with (a) correct License(s) tag in the spec file, and a build with
> that correct tag.  I do not have the numbers currently as to how
> many still need updating, it is not a small number.

As of yesterday afternoon, it was 3148 out of 4667 (~67%).  I posted a
full listing to fedora-legal-list here[1]:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00032.html

The list is based on what's in CVS, not what's been built.  (It's also
lower by 40 since I posted that.)

[1] If anyone can give me some pointers on getting a mapping of
packages <-> maintainers from the new packagedb, that'd be much
appreciated.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When you make a mistake, make amends immediately.  It's easier to eat
crow while it's still warm.

Attachment: pgp4pht8fWQ4S.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]