Making "upstream" tarballs available

Colin Walters walters at redhat.com
Fri Aug 31 20:56:35 UTC 2007


On 8/31/07, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> We can add the  recommendation but we can't eliminate the "SRPM is
> canonical" language as long as people still want the SRPM to be the
> canonical location.  To remove the exception, you'll have to talk to the
> devs involved to see whether they're against moving into hosted.fp.o.
>
> If everyone wants to we'd be happy to get rid of the exception :-)


Makes sense to me to say CVS+lookaside is canonical, not SRPMs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070831/12976f28/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list