[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: BIND will completely drop D-BUS dynamic forwarders table support



On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 06:28:27AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> NM shouldn't really care what the caching nameserver implementation is,
> anything is fine.  It just happens that the current bits talked to named
> because patches for dnsmasq didn't materialize out of thin air.  Plus
> I'd like to rethink how NM interacts with nameservers (ideally, NM waits
> for pulls, not pushes stuff out).

No, it should stay a push.  DNS configuration changes happen way less
often than DNS lookups, so the communication should be done on changes
(after an initial pull of course, which should include a "hi, I'm
here, talk to me").

  OG.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]