[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: BIND will completely drop D-BUS dynamic forwarders table support



On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 06:28 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:

> NM shouldn't really care what the caching nameserver implementation is,
> anything is fine.  It just happens that the current bits talked to named
> because patches for dnsmasq didn't materialize out of thin air.  Plus
> I'd like to rethink how NM interacts with nameservers (ideally, NM waits
> for pulls, not pushes stuff out).

IMO this is not ideal at all, NM knows when interfaces change, not the
other way around, *but* if you mean that NM should broadcast a generic
"an interface has changed" event and then wait for DNS daemons to query
NM to know what are the specifics, that makes indeed sense.

In this case we already have scripts in NM that get called when an
interface changes, I guess all we need is to:
A) make sure this is done for all interfaces including tun0, virt*
vlan*, whatever so that the thing is consistent and we do not need
special cases
B) each package will make scripts that can tell the appropriate daemon
in the appropriate way what happened so that it can fetch data out of NM

If tight integration exist in the DNS daemon of course all it can do is
just sit and wait for the message to appear on dbus I guess.

Simo.

-- 
| Simo S Sorce |
| Sr.Soft.Eng. |
| Red Hat, Inc |
| New York, NY |


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]