Yet another sa_restorer bug

[Lubomir Kundrak]

On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 13:14 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> On 12/18/2007 01:09 PM, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> > Oliver,
> > 
> > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:42 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426024
> >>
> >> This is the second sa_restorer bug I filed. However.
> >>
> >> I can only ask all of you to check if your pkgs do use signal.h and if,
> >> check if they do use sa_restorer.
> >>
> >> Maybe someone volunteers to do a grep over all sources!? And list the
> >> pkgs here!? Someone already did a similar job after the introduction of
> >> FORITIFY_SOURCE=2 with glibc's open check... I would do so myself, but I
> >> don't have the ressources at the moment...
> > 
> > I have complete rawhide source tree from 2007-11-14 exploded lying
> > around. I'll assume it's recent enough and will post the results of the
> > grep, but it takes some time as it's on a compressed filesystem.
> 
> Great Lubomir! Thx. I'm looking forward to see the results.

Here you are [1]. Just raw grep results, I hope it will help you find
out where to look for sa_restorer occurences.

[1] http://skosi.org/~lkundrak/misc/sa_restorer

Regards,
-- 
Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team)