[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Yet another sa_restorer bug



On 12/18/2007 02:32 PM, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 13:14 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
>> On 12/18/2007 01:09 PM, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
>>> Oliver,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:42 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426024
>>>>
>>>> This is the second sa_restorer bug I filed. However.
>>>>
>>>> I can only ask all of you to check if your pkgs do use signal.h and if,
>>>> check if they do use sa_restorer.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe someone volunteers to do a grep over all sources!? And list the
>>>> pkgs here!? Someone already did a similar job after the introduction of
>>>> FORITIFY_SOURCE=2 with glibc's open check... I would do so myself, but I
>>>> don't have the ressources at the moment...
>>> I have complete rawhide source tree from 2007-11-14 exploded lying
>>> around. I'll assume it's recent enough and will post the results of the
>>> grep, but it takes some time as it's on a compressed filesystem.
>> Great Lubomir! Thx. I'm looking forward to see the results.
> 
> Here you are [1]. Just raw grep results, I hope it will help you find
> out where to look for sa_restorer occurences.
> 
> [1] http://skosi.org/~lkundrak/misc/sa_restorer

Well. There are some in kernel - I don't want to touch that :-)

However, there are some that are already commented out - but some are
still serious.

I'll take a closer look on that in the next days and see how we can do
an easy join of the pkg names + maintainer mail :-)

-of


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]