[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora 8 review

Am Sa 22.Dezember 2007 schrieb Jeff Spaleta:
> On Dec 21, 2007 2:31 PM, Sebastian Vahl <ml deadbabylon de> wrote:
> > So what about releasing a top10 or top5 list of those bugs to
> > fedora-test-list? Bugs, that are hard to track or repoduce. There maybe
> > more people out there who could reproduce those bugs but haven't
> > encountered them yet. ATM those bugs are limited to the people who are
> > aware of them (mostly reporters and of course the assignees).
> We have a CommonProblems page right now
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/F8Common
> is that what you are looking for?
> But if we had reviewers doing their part and referencing bug
> tickets..it'd be pretty easy to compile an even better version of this
> page, just by reading reviews and seeing what reviewers ran into... if
> they actually cross-referenced tickets.  But unless they are
> cross-referencing tickets they aren't generating this sort of
> community value in their editorial comments.  I don't mind them point
> out the flaws that made it past testing, but they need to help us
> close the loop so we can get affected users the fixes and workarounds
> for those issues.  I'd love to give reviewers credit for finding
> install problems and helping point people to resources to
> fix/workaround the issue, but right now its just not something they
> generally care about. Reviewers generally do not care about helping
> the open development process for any open project.
> -jef

No. I've misread your mail a bit and was suggesting a top5 list of current 
rawhide hardware bugs which are hard to reproduce. With such a list these 
bugs could get more audience by other testers.

Sry, this was a bit off topic.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]