[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Broken deps in the stable release are not acceptable



On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 18:43 +0100, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> I just noticed that nobody sent out a FESCo Meeting Summary for 
> 2007-09-27[1].  There, we approved 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LubomirKundrak/SecurityUpdateProcessDraft 
> so the Fedora Security Response team would have to approve it before it 
> gets released as a security advisory.
> 
> [1] At least there's a log at 
> http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/FESCo-2007-09-27.html

Also, a meeting summary:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20070927

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple fedoraproject org>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]