FC7T1 and Bugzilla product / version

[Michel Salim]

2007/2/3, Will Woods <wwoods at redhat.com>:
> On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 17:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said:
> > > I don't.  More interestingly, is there value in having a test1 version instead
> > > of just defaulting to devel during the development process?  We wind up with
> > > a ton of bugs in both anyway, why double our search efforts?  What compelling
> > > reasons do we have for pooping out new versions to file bugs against for each
> > > test release, when we most likely want each bug reporter to update to latest
> > > rawhide and try it again?
> >
> > Requires manually shuffling the bugs to the final release later.
> > Other than that, no real issues.
>
> Yeah, it makes sense to me. I guess the weird part will be figuring out
> which of the 'devel' bugs are actually against F7 and which are from
> older releases.
>
How about filing bugs against 'devel' but adding a 'f7test1' keyword to it?


-- 
Michel Salim
http://hircus.wordpress.com/

My theology, briefly, is that the universe was dictated but not signed.
                -- Christopher Morley