[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Smolt: firsboot revisited



On 15.02.2007 06:58, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 00:34 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 05:48 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 10:59 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
So smolt is still setup in firstboot and still is opt in. My question is do we want to install smolt as part of a default configuration with F7. My vote is yes.
My vote is no.
* is legally questionable.
If you have a concern here, please file a bug on it and I will make sure
it gets passed into the legal queue for evaluation.
Everything that needed to be said had been communicated to Mr. McGrath.
It's up to him to decide on what to do with it.

Could you give a quick summary please? That would be very helpful, as there were a lot of mails on this topic in the last month, and one can't know which of them and which arguments in them you exactly mean. Thanks in advance.

 Please list the
country where you think the law might be violated.
Probably most parts of the world outside of the US, definitely in
Europe, definitely in Germany, probably also in some part of Asia.

I'm not a lawyer, but I live in Germany, and I think this kind of anonymous opt-in mechanism should be fine, as long as it's clearly documented what kind of informations are send. Ralf, could you give me some insight why you think this should the law might be violated?

@mmcgrath, is it clearly documented what informations are send? Wuld be ideal if one could open a window to see what informations are going to be send exactly. And will that part also translated -- it *could* be problematic if the text is not localized...

> [...]

CU
thl


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]