rawhide report: 20070220 changes

[Gilboa Davara]

On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:47 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 10:09 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:44 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:24 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 13:22 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 05:51 -0500, buildsys at redhat.com wrote:
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Updated Packages:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > libdrm-2.3.0-4.fc7
> > > > > > ------------------
> > > > > > * Mon Feb 19 2007 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 2.3.0-4
> > > > > > - Update nouveau patch
> > > > > > - Fix License tag and other rpmlint noise
> > > > > 
> > > > > OT question (that might not be related...)
> > > > > Any idea when the latest DRI drivers (especially, mach64 and nv) will
> > > > > imported into the kernel tree?
> > > > 
> > > > nv already is, though I might be a bit behind.
> > > > 
> > > > If there are significant mach64 changes since the last time Dave Airlie
> > > > pushed stuff upstream, it's news to me, but I admit to not watching
> > > > mach64 development very closely.
> > > 
> > > I should clarify.  The DRM is pretty close to current, afaik.  Mesa is
> > > behindish; not sure what the right thing to do there is.
> > > 
> > > - ajax
> > > 
> > 
> > Would the latest Mesa/DRM combo will find it's way into F7?
> 
> The question is how much breakage people are willing to put up with.
> Mesa doesn't release very often, and has a lot of churn.  While I
> certainly _can_ start doing snapshots...
> 
> That said I'm looking at some Mesa stuff this week, so hopefully I'll
> get a better idea of how stable head is right now.
> 
> - ajax
> 

Thanks.

- Gilboa