plans for long term support releases?

[Brian Pepple]

On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 08:05 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 04:36, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
> > Of course. Things all have to add up.
> > Still. is this even something we want for Fedora? It's quite possible
> > that we just don't want to do it, for any number of the problems brought
> > up throughout this thread. Then let's declare LTS out-of-scope for
> > Fedora and move along. Otherwise, lets see what *could* be done about it.
> 
> I think many of us have declared this out of scope for Fedora, you just 
> haven't moved on (:

+1

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070117/d731379f/attachment.sig>