dkms for fc7?
Jason L Tibbitts III
tibbs at math.uh.edu
Sat Jan 20 18:00:56 UTC 2007
>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> writes:
NM> dkms sort of works for kernel levels out-of-tree drivers bother to
NM> support finding a working combinaison of kernel & out-of-tree
NM> driver versions quickly degenerates (even for big drivers like
NM> nvidia)
You make it sound as if dkms is somehow a loss when compared with
other methods. The set of kernels that a specific dkms-enabled module
package supports (i.e. many) is still significantly larger than the
set of kernels supported by the other module packaging schemes (one).
Maintainer effort and end-user frustration are reduced. It is not
possible for them to be eliminated due to the nature of out-of-tree
modules.
As far as I can see, the only downside to dkms modules is the
requirement for a build environment on the client machines. (Well,
that and the lack of a set of packaging guidelines. The build
environment requirement kept dkms out of consideration for Fedora
Extras kernel modules, a decision which I still find completely mind
boggling.)
- J<
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list