New VCS Choice; SCM SIG

[Mike McGrath]

On 1/23/07, Kristian Høgsberg <krh at redhat.com> wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:57 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> >> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 08:25 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday 23 January 2007 01:44, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> My point was that git certainly isn't the exotic curiosity you try to paint it
> as.  It's way beyond critical mass and I'd wager at least as stable as CVS at
> this point.  Another point is that these projects likely care more about VCS
> than your average sourceforge project does, and as such have made much more
> informed decisions about this than the many projects out there that have just
> gone with the default lowest common denominator.


I think in general the idea has been distributed SCM vs
non-distributed SCM.  Some of us have been looking at git and hg on
the distributed side and IIRC, the general consensus is that git is
just very unpolished at this point.

            -Mike