rsyslog in f8?

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Jul 3 18:46:08 UTC 2007


On Tuesday 03 July 2007 14:41:00 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The rsyslog package has been approved and is ready to enter the
> collection. I just thought I would ask if anyone has any issues or
> concerns with switching to rsyslog for default system logger in f8?
>
> See:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureRsyslog
> and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831
>
> Would it be helpfull to get it pushed out for f7/devel without any
> Obsoletes first so folks can test it? Or should we just replace
> sysklogd in devel right off?

Instead of looking at this as a 'new default logger', perhaps it would be 
better to look at this as a 'rsyslogd is obsoleting sysklogd'.  Think of it 
purely within the scope of one package is replacing the other, due to things 
like sysklogd being dead upstream. In that context, we can do the replacement 
now and be happy.

It's a different subject as to if we want to "switch the default logger" or 
perhaps "switch to different logging options by default", and that could use 
some discussion with various folks.  However that is an aside to the pure 
technical thing of rsyslogd is replacing sysklogd.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070703/6072501a/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list