[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: EPEL branching if Fedora maintainer does not react



Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

. If the Fedora
maintainer later wants to participate in EPEL in general and maintain
this package, then the EPEL maintainer of the package should hand
primary per release maintainership back to the Fedora maintainer (and
become comaintainer, if interested).

This in essence would mean that the Fedora maintainer can essentally take over the EPEL branch even if there are long term contributors who have taken a good interest and contribute well to EPEL. Why is that desirable?

Rahul


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]