[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Amarok 2.0 - has anybody tried it?



Rex Dieter <rdieter <at> math.unl.edu> writes:
> Fedora is (still) missing a few needed deps... redland is one.

3.91.0 will also build without redland, you'll not get the Nepomuk stuff 
though. I don't know if Amarok 2 works without Nepomuk.

Redland alone isn't enough, by the way, we also need Soprano, a Qt binding for 
Redland: http://soprano.sourceforge.net/

By the way, I've updated Thomas Vander Stichele's redland specfile to 1.0.5:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647
The current version is 1.0.6, but that needs updates of raptor and rasqal too.

        Kevin Kofler


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]