[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/SecondaryArchitectures



Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 14:42 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 12:05 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

I'm only suggesting that the packager should need to _look_ at the
failure before filing the required ExcludeArch bug and pushing a 'ship
it anyway' button. I'm not saying that we should force them to start the
build from scratch again like we do at the moment.
I agree.  This is the largest objection I have to the current proposal.
This is a significant workflow change. How should we force the packager
to look at the failure before letting the packages push?

Depends on how you look at it really.  It's worth discussion anyway.

I would like to think that if a package has built for an architecture
before in the build system (i.e., we are not talking of the
bootstrapping phase), then subsequent build failures deserve a look
from the package maintainer.

Regards,
Manas


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]