[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rsyslog is in F8



seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 14:48 +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote:
>>> I was looking at the package of rsyslog: why do you apply a patch to
>>> rename the daemons from syslogd and klogd to 'rklogd' and 'rsyslogd'? If
>>> sysklogd is being replaced by the obsoletes in this package - why name
>>> this one differently?
>> because package name is rsyslog. The patch will be excluded in next
>> release, since it was accepted by upstream.
> 
> Yes, but the upstream makefile creates them as syslogd and klogd. 

http://rsyslog.cvs.sourceforge.net/rsyslog/rsyslog/Makefile.am?revision=1.10&view=markup

> Since
> we try to follow upstream as much as possible - what's the reason for
> the change in the binary name?
> 
> -sv
> 
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]