[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20070723 changes



Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:48:53 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote
> 
>> Perhaps you're seeing an issue w/a bad mirror?
> 
> No, the size mystery has cleared up.
> yum --upgrade shows me this:
> 
> Dependencies Resolved
> 
> =============================================================================
>  Package                 Arch       Version          Repository        Size
> =============================================================================
> Installing:
>  kernel-PAE              i686       2.6.23-0.44.rc0.git16.fc8  development        17 M
>  kernel-PAE-devel        i686       2.6.23-0.44.rc0.git16.fc8  development       4.6 M
> Removing:
>  kernel-PAE              i686       2.6.23-0.30.rc0.git6.fc8  installed          48 M
>  kernel-PAE              i686       2.6.22-8.fc8     installed          47 M
>  kernel-PAE              i686       2.6.23-0.35.rc0.git6.fc8  installed          48 M
>  kernel-PAE-devel        i686       2.6.23-0.35.rc0.git6.fc8  installed          15 M
>  kernel-PAE-devel        i686       2.6.23-0.30.rc0.git6.fc8  installed          15 M
>  kernel-PAE-devel        i686       2.6.22-8.fc8     installed          15 M
> 
> 
> The "Size" for the installed (to be removed) packages is the actual on
> disk size of the package (as displayed by --qf "%{SIZE}\n").
> The "Size" for the packages to be installed is the file size.

Ah, that size mismatch. Yeah, that's normal. :)

> Still does not explain why the other kernels have to go, though.

What Jesse said and/or the yum changelog and/or Seth says.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson redhat com


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]