Don't put new packages through updates-testing

[Hans de Goede]

David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 15:14 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers
>> arm-gp2x-linux-binutils
>> arm-gp2x-linux-gcc
>> arm-gp2x-linux-glibc
> 
> How have you dealt with the dependencies between gcc, libgcc.a, glibc
> and libgcc.so to get gcc and glibc into separate packages? Please tell
> me you didn't throw them all into the same SRPM :)
>

Yes I have seperate packages, my gcc spec file has a bootstrap %define, which 
when true drags in glibc only todo a ./configure ....; make headers-install in 
the glibc dir, so that I have headers to build gcc against. When bootstrap == 0 
an arm-gp2x-linux-glibc package is build-required and used (although as I type 
this I wonder if this is true, or if when compiling gcc it uses the native 
headers instead?? Hmm need to check).

> Are you using 'make headers_install' to get your kernel-headers? If not,
> please do.
> 

Erm, I'm using a prebuild kernel-headers tarbal which is used by pld for cross 
compilers and which is used in the compile from source sdk's currently 
available from the gp2x community.

Please see:
http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/

For the srpms and specs, any feedback much appreciated! arm-gp2x-linux-binutils 
has already been submitted for review (you want the 2.16.1 version, using 2.17 
for gp2x was a bad idea), I'm planning on submitting the rest tonight (I'm all 
done, I just need to fill in the review form)


I'm pretty new to all this cross compile stuff (sofar I've only used cross 
toolchains not build them myself) so I think those specs could really use a 
good look over, as said already any feedback is much appreciated!

Regards,

Hans