[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Why isn't emacs installed by default

Nicolas Mailhot writes:
 > Le Lun 4 juin 2007 12:06, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
 > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:42:29AM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote:
 > >> You may think you're funny, but you have to realize that if
 > >> emacs goes vi* is next.  The desktop seems to be controlled by
 > >> people with a windows envy.
 > >
 > > Indeed, but hopefully with the community involved and the tools in
 > > place
 > > (pungi) maybe it could be possible to do a spin for other userbases.
 > emacs and vi upstreams have the choice to update their software if
 > they want to keep it installed by default
 > vi is mostly safe - it's small and has discovered gtk.
 > emacs is going the way of the dodo because it targets 1995-ish
 > desktops, and we've not been shipping those for quite a long time. At
 > one point the hassle of catering for legacy needs outweights legacy
 > software benefits for most users.

Can you please explain what you are talking about?  By "targets
1995-ish desktops," do you mean that emacs lacks pop-up windows,
icons, menus, and so, on?  Or something else you desire?

What do you mean by "update their software"?  Do you mean "make it
more useful to developers"?  Or something else?


Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]