[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fedora for ARM



On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Andy Green wrote:

And what is being produced? An *.i386.rpm or an *.arm.rpm?

...
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/projects/octotux/packages/rpm/BUILD/mISDNuser-arm-root
Wrote: /projects/octotux/packages/rpm/SRPMS/mISDNuser-1.2.0-163.src.rpm
Wrote: /projects/octotux/packages/rpm/RPMS/arm/mISDNuser-1.2.0-163.arm.rpm

.arm.rpm?

If we have i386, i686 etc, shouldn't it rather be .armv5.rpm, .armv6.rpm etc, or actually your current -march flag like in my current -march=armv5te?

.arm.rpm would be OK once the ARM EABI is employed in latter GCC versions I guess, or?

Linus


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]