[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: tetex-doc is not noarch?



On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:16 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> >> Seems a bit odd:
> >>  tetex-doc               x86_64
> > 
> > Yup, this is odd.
> > 
> > The TeXLive 2007 packages which are now under review:
> > 
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/229180
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/242416
> > 
> > and splits the TeXLive into two parts just for this reason (the largest
> > part -> texmf tree, docs) is noarch and only the binary part, which is
> > arch specific, is packaged separately thanks to the better design of
> > TeXLive.
> > 
> > The packages are now in a ready-to-use(tm) state and needs review,
> > please help with it so that we can get rid of TeTeX soon.
> > 
> 
> You should update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureTexLive 
> and added it to Fedora 8 feature list.

Updated.

-- 
Jindrich Novy <jnovy redhat com>  http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]