[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: tetex-doc is not noarch?



Jindrich Novy wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:16 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Seems a bit odd:
>>  tetex-doc               x86_64
> 
> Yup, this is odd.
> 
> The TeXLive 2007 packages which are now under review:
> 
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/229180
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/242416
> 
> and splits the TeXLive into two parts just for this reason (the largest
> part -> texmf tree, docs) is noarch and only the binary part, which is
> arch specific, is packaged separately thanks to the better design of
> TeXLive.
> 
> The packages are now in a ready-to-use(tm) state and needs review,
> please help with it so that we can get rid of TeTeX soon.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jindrich
> 

OK, I'll try out the texlive packages.  Does this obsolete tetex?  Coexist? 
IOW, how should I install this on a current FC7 system that already has
tetex?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]