[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: To Require yelp or not to require yelp



On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 02:10:10PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> @Christopher: I have this scenario (taken out of bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242673) --
> user removes firefox from his system (for example, because he
> wants to install firefox.i386 instead of firefox.x86_64). Yum
> dutifuly notes, that depending package yelp will be also removed.

Doesn't this remind a bit like the ten year old "Windows needs
Explorer" issues, only now "Fedora needs Firefox"?

Maybe firefox should be split into libs and non-libs? yelp only needs
libgtkembedmoz.so, libxpcom.so, libxpcom_core.so and gecko-libs, not
firefox itself.

Requiring yelp only because an app ships a yelp file is like requiring
evince for shipping pdf docu or firefox for shipping html docu.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpsdXO4iox1a.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]