[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:31:19AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 06:06 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >  Can we have them in parallel ? I'm thinking of asynchronous builds of
> > what constitutes Fedora done on those box and error reports being
> > raised to the packager or as bugzilla entries if they fail. That would
> > be one start.
> Daniel, I have a feeling you've managed to miss the _entirety_ of the
> discussion that's gone before. You've presented a whole lot of rhetoric
> about stuff which bears no relation to what's being proposed, and then
> make a 'new' proposal which is very close to what Spot _did_ actually
> suggest.

Right, sorry. I will go down in my hole to avoid this in any possible future.
I still think what you are suggesting in the remaining of your mail does not
match what I suggested, bahh, no big deal.

Sorry for interrupting your discussion, you can come back to a normal work


Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]