[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Automating pam_keyring...



On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:46 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Denis Leroy <denis poolshark org> wrote:
> > Should it use a scriptlet that modifies /etc/pam.d/gdm in
> > %post (see http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232857 ).
> 
> It should just work for default desktop installs moving forward. I
> frankly don't care how.
> 
> > Or add a patch to the gdm package and make it require pam_keyring ?
> 
> uhm should avoid making this a hard requirement for gdm.  Can pam deal
> with a scenario
> where pam_keyring is referenced as an optional rule in the auth stack
> but the pam_keyring module is not actually installed? And don't we at
> least have to also consider this being used in the pam stack for kdm,
> since kdm can start a gnome desktop session?
Pam deals with it fine (allows login for nonexistent 'optional'
modules), but it will issue a nasty warning in syslog. I think that
editing gdm config within a %post script is fine.

-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]