[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 586 kernels.



On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Dave Jones wrote:

On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:03:21PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dave Jones (davej redhat com) said:
> > Yeah. The alternative is that I un-kill 586, and we continue shipping
> > that forever.  (Or we just tell those 38 586 users to go make their
> > own spin).
>
> Patch RPM. :P

Oh yeah, that's always a good idea ;-)

We could always encode /proc/cpuinfo + compiler flags used into dependencies and... :)

Since my last foray into the rpm source, I have even more respect
for pnasrat.  I'd drink a lot more if I were in his position.

Hehe, can I quote you on that (I work on RPM these days with Paul) ;)
Oh and btw, RPM 4.4.2.1 will support %patch -F<n> too.

	- Panu -


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]