FESCo elections
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Mon Jun 25 16:14:16 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 12:04 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2007 12:02:53 Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Well, it requires gaming gpg.mit.edu in the process, but I'm sure it
> > could be done.
>
> Not really. I have unlimited email addresses at my disposal, and I can
> generate a new gpg key for each and upload them. No "gaming" necessary.
Well, that's within my definition of gaming a system - taking advantage
of a flaw, weakness, or other open part to get an outcome that you want.
Is the first priority in Fedora elections protection of the election
system?
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070625/77f12a52/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list