[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rpms/libupnp/FC-6 .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 libupnp.spec, 1.12, 1.13 sources, 1.8, 1.9



Le mardi 26 juin 2007 à 21:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt a écrit :
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:46:05 +0200 (CEST), Eric TANGUY wrote:
> 
> > I just announce this on fedora-maintainers list with copy to the owners
> > concerned. All seem to be agree to rebuild their packages against this new
> > lib but we have some questions about this :
> > 
> > we tried to rebuild our packages (ushare and gmediaserver) for F-7 but the
> > build system does not see the new libupnp which is in update-testing. What
> > to do ?
> 
> Mail rel-eng and request that they tag the package accordingly. With
> koji/bodhi and stable dist targets, only stable updates make it into the
> buildroots by default. This is different than with the plague buildsys.
> 
> > When we will be ready how to push all the packages at the same time ? And
> > how to synchronize this with livna ?
> 
> Building a complete set of updates is a prerequisite to being able to push
> all packages quickly.
> 
> Livna doesn't build against updates-testing, however, so making sure that
> the packages do rebuild successfully as soon as the Fedora updates are
> released would be important. That is, no surprises such as API breakage
> and untested rebuilds.
> 
> Since different people push the packages, the maximum that can be done
> is to keep the "broken deps" window short.
> 

So libupnp, ushare and gmediaserver are in -testing. vlc from livna is
ready to be rebuilt as soon as libupnp will be in stable. The question
is : do we wait 5 or 7 days before pushing libupnp, ushare and
gmediaserver in stable or do we push their asap ?

Eric


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]