[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: XULRunner - will be or won't be?

On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:25 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > 
> >> I see that John asked for feedback 2 days ago, I don't see a single
> >> reponse to that - do you really think that is sufficient discussion to
> >> ratify this tomorrow ?!
> > 
> > John send the mail and the meeting agenda for FESCo has the item listed 
> > again which provides alteast two different opportunities for folks to 
> > provide any feedback necessary.
> > 
> > I send feedback via the wiki as asked in the earlier mail. Policies and 
> > guidelines are living documents and can (or will) be updated based on 
> > feedback if there is any even after they are ratified.  Additional 
> > discussions can happen at any point of time. I was merely pointing out 
> > that feedback was indeed asked.
> That makes no sense.  Are you seriously telling me that you ratify 
> changes that may be sub-par with the intent that they can be changed? 
> What is the point of voting then?  Just let any old change through and 
> fix it later.


> Sounds like you need to revise your ratification process (or lack 
> thereof) before people should feel comfortable following anything that 
> gets "voted" on.

Rahul isn't on FESCo.  And I agree this needs more discussion before
being ratified.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]