[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Upgrade path question



Adam Jackson (ajackson redhat com) said: 
> > Strawman would be if we're supporting N-2, to garbage collect after N-4?
> 
> That sounds reasonable to me.  Stride 4 would mean two years to learn a
> new name and/or upgrade, which seems plausible.
> 
> Just to be sure we're interpreting this the same way:  X was provided by
> xorg-x11 in FC-4, but modular packages in FC-5.  My interpretation of
> N-4 would be that the Prov/Obs for xorg-x11 could then be removed in the
> rawhide cycle between F-8 and F-9.

My interpretationg would be *after* F-9. I suppose that means I should
write something and send it to the PC.

Bill


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]