[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070628) FESCO meeting



On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:07 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:55 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:38 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:26 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > > > > /topic FESCO-Meeting -- MISC -- Feature Polict Draft -
> > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/FeaturePolicyDraft 
> > > > 
> > > > Please pull this one.  It's only had two days of commenting on the list.
> > > > 
> > > > Note, this isn't a comment on the draft itself.  Just that I don't think
> > > > sufficient time has passed for FESCo to really decide anything on it.
> > > 
> > > Doesn't mean it can't be discussed within FESCo... just because we
> > > discuss doesn't mean there has to be a decision tomorrow.
> > 
> > True.  But we're consistently running long on meetings these days.  I
> > see no need to discuss it during the meeting when it's only been an RFC
> > since Monday.
> 
> Large chunks of what we discuss has only come up within the space of the
> previous few days...
> 
> > If FESCo members really have much to say about it, they can respond to
> > John's original thread, which has gotten exactly 0 feedback.
> 
> Maybe the silence is due to agreement (not that I really think so, but
> still ;-)   And this is exactly the sort of new things that we're saying
> are in FESCo's arena with the merge... so if we put off talking about
> it, then it further decreases the chances of having any sort of coherent
> idea of what's going on for Fedora 8.

And we _have_ to talk about it in a meeting?  What is wrong with email
discussion on this list?

Seriously, there are two possible outcomes of talking about this now
during the meeting itself:

1)  We banter back and forth a bit, and then defer it to later because
there isn't enough discussion about it in the community yet or some
changes need to be made.

2)  We banter back and forth a bit and then vote on it, probably doing
so too soon, and have to amend it based on feedback from the community.
Suck

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]