[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070628) FESCO meeting



On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:04 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:07 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:55 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:38 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:26 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > > > > > /topic FESCO-Meeting -- MISC -- Feature Polict Draft -
> > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/FeaturePolicyDraft 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please pull this one.  It's only had two days of commenting on the list.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Note, this isn't a comment on the draft itself.  Just that I don't think
> > > > > sufficient time has passed for FESCo to really decide anything on it.
> > > > 
> > > > Doesn't mean it can't be discussed within FESCo... just because we
> > > > discuss doesn't mean there has to be a decision tomorrow.
> > > 
> > > True.  But we're consistently running long on meetings these days.  I
> > > see no need to discuss it during the meeting when it's only been an RFC
> > > since Monday.
> > 
> > Large chunks of what we discuss has only come up within the space of the
> > previous few days...
> > 
> > > If FESCo members really have much to say about it, they can respond to
> > > John's original thread, which has gotten exactly 0 feedback.
> > 
> > Maybe the silence is due to agreement (not that I really think so, but
> > still ;-)   And this is exactly the sort of new things that we're saying
> > are in FESCo's arena with the merge... so if we put off talking about
> > it, then it further decreases the chances of having any sort of coherent
> > idea of what's going on for Fedora 8.
> 
> And we _have_ to talk about it in a meeting?  What is wrong with email
> discussion on this list?

That people don't respond to them.  Just go through the mailing lists,
and look at how many threads where input is asked for, are never
responded to.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple fedoraproject org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]